Owned local sample / Recorded 8 September 2026

See the bug.
Then inspect the evidence.

An invoice and shipping fixture with deliberately seeded faults. Compare the outcomes to see why one passing test cannot tell the whole story.

19task executions
9passed
10failed
6mutation survivors

A passing test misses the shipping fault.

The fast-check property test passes, while unit, API, combinatorial property, browser and Gherkin checks fail. The sample deliberately changes the shipping boundary.

Actual task outcomes from the owned local sample
METHODTASK RESULTCHECKS PASSEDCHECKS FAILED
Unit testsFailed31
API checksFailed21
Property checks · combinationsFailed01
Property checks · fast-checkPassed10
Browser checksFailed01
Gherkin scenariosFailed11

Six of twelve mutations survived in the fixed sample. This educational fixture was executed locally. It contains no customer data, cloud execution or model-generated results. These outcomes demonstrate the included tests and known faults; they do not establish customer results or live provider qualification.

Reproduce the unit examples yourself.

The evidence pack includes the specification, source, tests, measured outcomes, selected native reports and SHA256 checksums. Extract it and use Node 20 or later to run the included unit examples:

node --test sample/tests/rules.test.cjs

The exported files preserve the original internal product label, Tenhaw Quality. The name of the marketed product is still being decided.

Meet your AI testing workhorse

Bring your toughest code.
Set your highest bar.

See how the AI testing team would challenge your next release. We’ll scope the methods, automation and evidence around your software.

Request a walkthrough

Discuss an evaluation. No purchase commitment.